chore(ci): add explicit least-privilege workflow permissions#3082
Merged
geruh merged 5 commits intoapache:mainfrom Feb 25, 2026
Merged
chore(ci): add explicit least-privilege workflow permissions#3082geruh merged 5 commits intoapache:mainfrom
geruh merged 5 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
geruh
reviewed
Feb 25, 2026
| docs: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: write |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Added explicit permissions blocks to GitHub Actions workflows to satisfy CodeQL actions/missing-workflow-permissions. (See the Security tab on Github)
Defaulted workflows to
contents: read.The one write permission
contents: writeis set only for the docs publish job inpython-release-docs.yml, because that job force-pushes generated site content to the gh-pages branch.Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?