ZOOKEEPER-4992: Avoid overriding same-subject certs in PEM trust store#2336
ZOOKEEPER-4992: Avoid overriding same-subject certs in PEM trust store#2336tsaarni wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
tsaarni
force-pushed
the
fix-zookeeper-4992
branch
from
dbbad6f to
95bd22b
Compare
|
One of the CI tests failed, but I think it might just be a flake. @kezhuw, could you please re-run the test? |
|
When you have a chance, could someone review this PR? Thanks! |
anmolnar
left a comment
anmolnar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm fine with the patch overall, but I have a small suggestion.
| for (X509Certificate certificate : certificateChain) { | ||
| X500Principal principal = certificate.getSubjectX500Principal(); | ||
| keyStore.setCertificateEntry(principal.getName("RFC2253"), certificate); | ||
| keyStore.setCertificateEntry(principal.getName("RFC2253") + "-" + i++, certificate); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shall we check the name already exists first and add the suffix only when it's necessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anmolnar Yes, that's a good idea. I updated it and added a check to make sure the aliases have the right suffix. Now, the first suffix starts from 2 since the first one doesn't have one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The sequence numbers in the suffixes aren't working perfectly logically, for example, if adding four certificates with subjects cn=foo, cn=foo, cn=bar and cn=bar, the aliases become cn=foo, cn=foo-2, cn=bar, and cn=bar-3, but I hope it does not need to be perfect, since the keystore aliases are not really used for anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @anmolnar, gentle ping on this PR. I'm happy to make further tweaks.
Signed-off-by: Tero Saarni <tero.saarni@est.tech>
tsaarni
force-pushed
the
fix-zookeeper-4992
branch
from
95bd22b to
6b87ef5
Compare
2 participants
When a PEM bundle is loaded as a trust store, each certificate is added to an in-memory
KeyStore.Previously, the certificate’s subject name was used as the alias, which caused entries to be overwritten when multiple certificates shared the same subject name.
This change assigns a unique alias to each certificate, ensuring that all certificates from the PEM bundle are preserved in the trust store.
Certificates valid at the same time can share the same subject name, for example CA certificate might be reissued with another key type.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ZOOKEEPER/issues/ZOOKEEPER-4992